深入解析fsockopen与pfsockopen的区别

  按手册上说,这两个函数的唯一区别是,pfsockopen是持续连接,而fsockopen不是.

  我写了个代码了一下:

  

复制代码 代码如下:

  <?php

  $data="1,0,721,73,1,0,0,43290000,0,60D81D509BC00451,3,FFFFFFFF";

  //http://10.144.99.114/SANEX_NEW/modules/subscribemanager/test.php

  $host = '127.0.0.1';

  $url = "/aa.php";

  $pffirst = false;

  $times = 1000;

  $startTime = microtime(true);

  for ($index = 0; $index < $times; $index++) {

  echo httpPost($host,$url,$data,$pffirst)."<hr><br />";

  }

  $middleTime = microtime(true);

  for ($index = 0; $index < $times; $index++) {

  echo httpPost($host,$url,$data,!$pffirst)."<hr><br />";;

  }

  $endTime = microtime(true);

  echo ($pffirst?"pfsocket":"fsocket").":".($middleTime-$startTime);

  echo "<br />";

  echo ($pffirst?"fsocket":"pfsocket").":".($endTime-$middleTime);

  $count=0;

  //发包函数

  function httpPost($host,$url,$data,$p)

  {

  global $count;

  $func = $p?"pfsockopen":"fsockopen";

  $conn = $func($host,80,$errno, $errstr, 30);

  if (!$conn)

  {

  echo "$errstr ($errno)<br />\n";

  return;

  }

  $header = "POST ".$url." HTTP/1.1\r\n";

  $header.= "Host : {$host}\r\n";

  $header.= "Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\r\n";

  $header.= "Content-Length:".strlen($data)."\r\n";

  $header.= "Connection: Keep-Alive\r\n\r\n";

  $header.= "{$data}\r\n\r\n";

  fwrite($conn,$header);

  $count++;

  echo $count.' '.$header."<br /><br />";

  $resp='';

  //while (!feof($conn)) {

  // $resp .= fgets($conn);

  //}

  //fclose($conn);

  return $resp;

  }

  ?>

  结果发现:

  代码的倒数第二行,如果把//fclose($conn);注释掉,结果是:

  fsocket:11.04693198204

  pfsocket:0.34867787361145

  

  如果不注释:

  fsocket:12.509312152863

  pfsocket:11.120275974274

  可以看出,fsocketopen默认每次处理结束后,就算协议头是Keep-Alive,连接仍然断掉了.

  而pfsocketopen在Keep-Alive条件下,连接可以被下一次重复利用.

  一次连接发送大量数据时,推荐使用pfsocketopen